“You shouldn’t be banned from one platform and not others if you are providing ‘misinformation out there.” — The real question is who is deciding what misinformation is? Are we going by “fact-checkers”? The same fact-checkers said what we reported last year was FALSE concerning the fact that pandemic may have started as a ‘lab leak’ — now have changed their stance! But that didn’t change the fact that we were blacklisted — censored — and removed from BIG TECH. So could we have been banned … for months on end until the facts caught up with the fact-checkers across all platforms? Who’s deciding?
WH proposes coordination across all Social Media platforms
Fair Use Notice:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.